Who designed the Australian Coat of Arms?
My friend and I are working on our first Australian Design assessment task and still unsure what we should discuss.
I thought of the idea of talking about our Coat of Arms but is that illegal? I’ve read somewhere it is prohibited to use it.
“Use of the arms by private citizens or organisations is rarely permitted, however there are provisions for use by sporting bodies and in educational publications. Use of the coat of arms without permission may be in breach of Sections 53 (c) (d) and (e) of the Trade Practices Act 1974, Section 145.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 or Section 39(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1995.” – Wikipedia
Would we be able to discuss it?
If so, does anyone know who designed it? I just need some names.
Thanks all!
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
biff.1145
May 20, 2011 12:11 pm
The absence of specific references to the states in the shield in the 1908 Arms led to a number of alterations approved on the recommendation of the Commonwealth Government by King George V. The new design included a shield with six parts each containing a representation of the badge of a state.
The designer of the NSW Coat of Arms, William Gullick, was also involved in the creation of the Australian Coat of Arms
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Tiffany S
July 10, 2011 8:07 pm
Is this website legal underneath of Code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act signed by B. Clinton in 1995?
With all of the nigerian scammers and other release of 3rd party information to internet criminals, is this website ( http://www.suwanneesheriff.com/ ) even legal under Code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act signed by Bill Clinton in 1995? It shows pictures addresses and more information about inmates and previous inmates that have been booked at the Suwannee Valley Sheriff’s department. I see how it would be beneficial to expose information about felons and pedophiles like the FBI website does,but is it really fair that there is public information about people who drove while their license was suspended displayed on a website? Who would want to live in Suwannee County (or Live Oak) knowing that their information would be put on this website for internet criminals to obtain?Another indication that this website might not even be legal under the Constitution is by the spelling errors contained in it.Look at http://www.suwanneesheriff.com/Inmates.aspx?BookingNum=070001185 BRUGLARY?
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
jse_services
July 11, 2011 12:32 pm
If assault is committed in reaction to protecting me and my child against emotional abuse…?
Is this considered self-defence? There was no intent to assault – it was more a case of an err in judgement which resulted in a minor injury to the party who was being emotionally abusive.
The Criminal Code Act 1995 (Australia) states:
10.4 Self-defence
(1) A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if he or
she carries out the conduct constituting the offence in
self-defence.
(2) A person carries out conduct in self-defence if and only if he or she
believes the conduct is necessary:
(a) to defend himself or herself or another person; or
(b) to prevent or terminate the unlawful imprisonment
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
JASON
July 18, 2011 10:27 pm
U.S/ U.S.A BORDER CROSSING TROUBLE?
In 2003, I was charged (not convicted) with credit card obtained by crime and a failure to appear. They are are my first and only charges. I was given a conditional discharge of 9 months probation. With a conditional discharge your criminal record is erased 3 years later.
2004, I tried crossing the border (24yrs old) I was young and dumb and didn’t know the legality or terms of my charges. They asked me if I had ever been convicted, I said yes. HOWEVER I have never been convicted of a crime, only charged. At that time I did not have a criminal record either because it was not a conviction. Anyhow they took my picture and fingerprints at the American Border.
1- Is there some place I can call or go to dispute my case?
2- is there somewhere I can contact to see what they have on file about me?
3- What can they actually see at the border?
4- Is there a border agency I can contact?
5- I want to go to America I am not a criminal!
6- Any solutions? HELP
Government Agency: NATIONAL PAROLE BOARD of Canada
If you have only received absolute or conditional discharges, you do not need to apply for a pardon. If you received an absolute discharge on or after July 24, 1992, the RCMP will automatically remove it from its system one year after the court decision. If you received a conditional discharge on or after July 24, 1992, the RCMP will automatically remove it 3 years after the court decision. If you received an absolute or conditional discharge before July 24, 1992, contact the RCMP to have the information removed (RCMP Pardon & Purge Services, P.O. Box 8885, Ottawa, ON K1G 3M8).
Criminal code:
For your info. -
Criminal Records Act – Discharges
6.1 (1) No record of a discharge under section 730 of the Criminal Code that is in the custody of the Commissioner or of any department or agency of the Government of Canada shall be disclosed to any person, nor shall the existence of the record or the fact of the discharge be disclosed to any person, without the prior approval of the Minister, if
(a) more than one year has elapsed since the offender was discharged absolutely; or
(b) more than three years have elapsed since the offender was discharged on the conditions prescribed in a probation order.
Purging C.P.I.C.
(2) The Commissioner shall remove all references to a discharge under section 730 of the Criminal Code from the automated criminal conviction records retrieval system maintained by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police on the expiration of the relevant period referred to in subsection (1).
1992, c. 22, s. 6; 1995, c. 22, s. 17(E)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
POLITICS
July 22, 2011 7:36 am
Its legal and a law firm owns the website if you check out the info so those guys know their rights. Live Oak is a small town though and they probably send the rejected imbecile police there for training or whatever. That would explain the spelling errors. I dont think they care what their spelling looks like. They just want to push faces on their website and hang people up like crooks. Always makes the police look better. Get into criminal psychology and understand why the police need to prop up on whoever they come across ok? The police have the right to lie, manipulate, and bribe and intimidate up to a point. Thats why there is so much political crap flying around the FBI spying on local law enforcement agencies. The law enforcement agencies dont like it and want to run amook with their own agendas. Pay checks have to come from somewhere you know!!!
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Sam
July 28, 2011 11:42 am
Can disclaimer clauses be used to cover the act of selling imitation goods?
Disclaimer
By viewing this page and any other page enclosed in this site，you agree to such terms. If you are affiliated with or working for Rolex or any of the enclosed name brand mentioned products either directly or indirectly，or any other related group，or were formally a worker you CANNOT enter this web site，cannot access any of its files and you cannot view any of the HTML files. If in fact you are affiliated or were affiliated with the above said companies，by entering this site you are not agreeing to these terms and are violating code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act signed by Bill Clinton in 1995 and that means that you CANNOT threaten our ISP(s) or any person(s) or company storing these files， and CANNOT prosecute any person(s) affiliated with this page which includes family，friends or individuals who run or enter this site. By continuing to enter this site，you are expressly and impliedly agreeing to all terms as stated above and affirm that you are in compliance with all federal，state and local laws concerning the content of this site.
The products we sell are replicas of their genuine counterparts. In no way are we representing them as the genuine watch， nor are we affiliated with the original manufacturers in any way， shape， or form. None of these watches carry the warranty， nor the parts， of the original manufacturers. All of our products are replicas and are meant for entertainment & novelty purposes only. These replica timepieces are not to be sold as Authentic. By purchasing our products， Due to the fact that these Rolex replica Timepieces are identical in every way， the buyer must agree not to re-sell these Rolex replica Timepieces as Genuine.The owners of this site take no responsibility for what people do with these Watches after they receive them and assume no civil or criminal liability for the resale of any Watches purchased from this site. By purchasing one of our replicas the buyer agrees to all policies stated herein.
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Cliff
July 28, 2011 12:37 pm
Self defense only applies in cases where you are defending yourself from PHYSICAL harm…
BUT…If you had no intent, you aren’t guilty of assault.
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Ruth S
July 28, 2011 12:43 pm
Without getting into all the legalities of selling imitation goods – Knock offs, as they are called! As long as you STATE that THIS IS WHAT IT IS, you can sell anything you want! A lot of people cannot afford to buy the real thing, but a well made “knock Off” could make you feel like a million dollars!!! As long as the person who is buying it KNOWS what it is, I don’t see any problem!! When giving a receipt to a buyer, make sure it STATES what it is, in black and white!! One thing though, don’t try to sell the item at the real item’s price!!!
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
bow chicka bow bow
July 28, 2011 6:48 pm
If you were given a conditional discharge then you were convicted or you pled ‘no contest’. You can’t be given a sentence of any sort unless you are only charged. Because they denied you entry before, its in their system so don’t lie or they may ban you permanently. Quote from the US border services website:
“Discharges or pardons may be considered by a CBP Officer to mitigate a reason to deny entry, although they do not guarantee it. As mentioned above, being convicted of some crimes will permanently bar the offender from entry into the U.S.”
Best bet, contact the nearest US consulate and apply for a waiver. Once you have a waiver, you should be OK (juswt make sure to carry a copy of it every time you travel).
January 30, 2011
12:50 pm
Who designed the Australian Coat of Arms?
My friend and I are working on our first Australian Design assessment task and still unsure what we should discuss.
I thought of the idea of talking about our Coat of Arms but is that illegal? I’ve read somewhere it is prohibited to use it.
“Use of the arms by private citizens or organisations is rarely permitted, however there are provisions for use by sporting bodies and in educational publications. Use of the coat of arms without permission may be in breach of Sections 53 (c) (d) and (e) of the Trade Practices Act 1974, Section 145.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 or Section 39(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1995.” – Wikipedia
Would we be able to discuss it?
If so, does anyone know who designed it? I just need some names.
Thanks all!
May 20, 2011
12:11 pm
The absence of specific references to the states in the shield in the 1908 Arms led to a number of alterations approved on the recommendation of the Commonwealth Government by King George V. The new design included a shield with six parts each containing a representation of the badge of a state.
The designer of the NSW Coat of Arms, William Gullick, was also involved in the creation of the Australian Coat of Arms
July 10, 2011
8:07 pm
Is this website legal underneath of Code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act signed by B. Clinton in 1995?
With all of the nigerian scammers and other release of 3rd party information to internet criminals, is this website ( http://www.suwanneesheriff.com/ ) even legal under Code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act signed by Bill Clinton in 1995? It shows pictures addresses and more information about inmates and previous inmates that have been booked at the Suwannee Valley Sheriff’s department. I see how it would be beneficial to expose information about felons and pedophiles like the FBI website does,but is it really fair that there is public information about people who drove while their license was suspended displayed on a website? Who would want to live in Suwannee County (or Live Oak) knowing that their information would be put on this website for internet criminals to obtain?Another indication that this website might not even be legal under the Constitution is by the spelling errors contained in it.Look at http://www.suwanneesheriff.com/Inmates.aspx?BookingNum=070001185 BRUGLARY?
July 11, 2011
12:32 pm
If assault is committed in reaction to protecting me and my child against emotional abuse…?
Is this considered self-defence? There was no intent to assault – it was more a case of an err in judgement which resulted in a minor injury to the party who was being emotionally abusive.
The Criminal Code Act 1995 (Australia) states:
10.4 Self-defence
(1) A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if he or
she carries out the conduct constituting the offence in
self-defence.
(2) A person carries out conduct in self-defence if and only if he or she
believes the conduct is necessary:
(a) to defend himself or herself or another person; or
(b) to prevent or terminate the unlawful imprisonment
July 18, 2011
10:27 pm
U.S/ U.S.A BORDER CROSSING TROUBLE?
In 2003, I was charged (not convicted) with credit card obtained by crime and a failure to appear. They are are my first and only charges. I was given a conditional discharge of 9 months probation. With a conditional discharge your criminal record is erased 3 years later.
2004, I tried crossing the border (24yrs old) I was young and dumb and didn’t know the legality or terms of my charges. They asked me if I had ever been convicted, I said yes. HOWEVER I have never been convicted of a crime, only charged. At that time I did not have a criminal record either because it was not a conviction. Anyhow they took my picture and fingerprints at the American Border.
1- Is there some place I can call or go to dispute my case?
2- is there somewhere I can contact to see what they have on file about me?
3- What can they actually see at the border?
4- Is there a border agency I can contact?
5- I want to go to America I am not a criminal!
6- Any solutions? HELP
Government Agency: NATIONAL PAROLE BOARD of Canada
If you have only received absolute or conditional discharges, you do not need to apply for a pardon. If you received an absolute discharge on or after July 24, 1992, the RCMP will automatically remove it from its system one year after the court decision. If you received a conditional discharge on or after July 24, 1992, the RCMP will automatically remove it 3 years after the court decision. If you received an absolute or conditional discharge before July 24, 1992, contact the RCMP to have the information removed (RCMP Pardon & Purge Services, P.O. Box 8885, Ottawa, ON K1G 3M8).
Criminal code:
For your info. -
Criminal Records Act – Discharges
6.1 (1) No record of a discharge under section 730 of the Criminal Code that is in the custody of the Commissioner or of any department or agency of the Government of Canada shall be disclosed to any person, nor shall the existence of the record or the fact of the discharge be disclosed to any person, without the prior approval of the Minister, if
(a) more than one year has elapsed since the offender was discharged absolutely; or
(b) more than three years have elapsed since the offender was discharged on the conditions prescribed in a probation order.
Purging C.P.I.C.
(2) The Commissioner shall remove all references to a discharge under section 730 of the Criminal Code from the automated criminal conviction records retrieval system maintained by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police on the expiration of the relevant period referred to in subsection (1).
1992, c. 22, s. 6; 1995, c. 22, s. 17(E)
July 22, 2011
7:36 am
Its legal and a law firm owns the website if you check out the info so those guys know their rights. Live Oak is a small town though and they probably send the rejected imbecile police there for training or whatever. That would explain the spelling errors. I dont think they care what their spelling looks like. They just want to push faces on their website and hang people up like crooks. Always makes the police look better. Get into criminal psychology and understand why the police need to prop up on whoever they come across ok? The police have the right to lie, manipulate, and bribe and intimidate up to a point. Thats why there is so much political crap flying around the FBI spying on local law enforcement agencies. The law enforcement agencies dont like it and want to run amook with their own agendas. Pay checks have to come from somewhere you know!!!
July 28, 2011
11:42 am
Can disclaimer clauses be used to cover the act of selling imitation goods?
Disclaimer
By viewing this page and any other page enclosed in this site，you agree to such terms. If you are affiliated with or working for Rolex or any of the enclosed name brand mentioned products either directly or indirectly，or any other related group，or were formally a worker you CANNOT enter this web site，cannot access any of its files and you cannot view any of the HTML files. If in fact you are affiliated or were affiliated with the above said companies，by entering this site you are not agreeing to these terms and are violating code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act signed by Bill Clinton in 1995 and that means that you CANNOT threaten our ISP(s) or any person(s) or company storing these files， and CANNOT prosecute any person(s) affiliated with this page which includes family，friends or individuals who run or enter this site. By continuing to enter this site，you are expressly and impliedly agreeing to all terms as stated above and affirm that you are in compliance with all federal，state and local laws concerning the content of this site.
The products we sell are replicas of their genuine counterparts. In no way are we representing them as the genuine watch， nor are we affiliated with the original manufacturers in any way， shape， or form. None of these watches carry the warranty， nor the parts， of the original manufacturers. All of our products are replicas and are meant for entertainment & novelty purposes only. These replica timepieces are not to be sold as Authentic. By purchasing our products， Due to the fact that these Rolex replica Timepieces are identical in every way， the buyer must agree not to re-sell these Rolex replica Timepieces as Genuine.The owners of this site take no responsibility for what people do with these Watches after they receive them and assume no civil or criminal liability for the resale of any Watches purchased from this site. By purchasing one of our replicas the buyer agrees to all policies stated herein.
July 28, 2011
12:37 pm
Self defense only applies in cases where you are defending yourself from PHYSICAL harm…
BUT…If you had no intent, you aren’t guilty of assault.
July 28, 2011
12:43 pm
Without getting into all the legalities of selling imitation goods – Knock offs, as they are called! As long as you STATE that THIS IS WHAT IT IS, you can sell anything you want! A lot of people cannot afford to buy the real thing, but a well made “knock Off” could make you feel like a million dollars!!! As long as the person who is buying it KNOWS what it is, I don’t see any problem!! When giving a receipt to a buyer, make sure it STATES what it is, in black and white!! One thing though, don’t try to sell the item at the real item’s price!!!
July 28, 2011
6:48 pm
If you were given a conditional discharge then you were convicted or you pled ‘no contest’. You can’t be given a sentence of any sort unless you are only charged. Because they denied you entry before, its in their system so don’t lie or they may ban you permanently. Quote from the US border services website:
“Discharges or pardons may be considered by a CBP Officer to mitigate a reason to deny entry, although they do not guarantee it. As mentioned above, being convicted of some crimes will permanently bar the offender from entry into the U.S.”
Best bet, contact the nearest US consulate and apply for a waiver. Once you have a waiver, you should be OK (juswt make sure to carry a copy of it every time you travel).