Can you name a case marking some development in state or federal constitutional law that was decided in 2010?
I’d prefer a case that has little to nothing to do with criminal law OR the recent Citizens United opinion. For example, a case involving the commerce clause (Article I, sec. 8), or the Second, Ninth, Tenth, or Fourteenth Amendments in the U.S. Constitution, or a “landmark” case involving a state constitution. Case must have been decided/filed in 2010. Case must mark some important development in state or federal constitutional law. GO!!!
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
MacJedi
June 28, 2011 5:31 am
how about this one: On January 5, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rendered a decision in a voting disenfranchisement case that found against Washington State’s voting law that disenfranchised thousands of individuals with past felony convictions. It was an important case because a disproportionate number of these individuals were Blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans. The decision highlighted the fact that people of color are disproportionately convicted, and thus disproportionately impacted by barriers that prohibit them from being fully privileged citizens after paying their debt to society.
NO. 06-35669
D.C. NO. CV-96-0076-RHW EASTERN WASHINGTON (TACOMA)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Smells like New ILLEGAL MEXICANS
July 12, 2011 8:10 pm
Is this why SB 1070 is needed Search for Illegal Involved in Shootout Continues 15 prior criminal cases?
ARIZONA CITY, Ariz. – Pinal County authorities are continuing their search for an Arizona City man with an extensive criminal history who was involved in a gunfight with sheriff’s deputies.
The sheriff’s office says it received a 911 call Monday night from a child who claimed her father was trying to get inside her home south of Casa Grande. The man no longer lives there, and the girl’s mother apparently has an order of protection against him.
When deputies arrived, they say 38-year-old Jose Manuel Gonzalez-Sandoval began shooting at them and they returned fire. There were no reported injuries and deputies say Gonzalez-Sandoval was last seen running from the scene.
The Arizona Department of Public Safety, U.S. Border Patrol and Pinal County Regional SWAT team are assisting in the search for Gonzalez-Sandoval.
Authorities say Gonzalez-Sandoval has 15 prior criminal cases, including two last month, under seven different aliases. He is not a U.S. citizen.
Back on July 14, DPS booked Gonzalez-Sandoval into the Pinal County Adult Detention Facility on an outstanding warrant. He was turned over to ICE for deportation — but they released him as a Legal Permanent Resident Alien, according to the Pinal County Sheriff’s Office.
Then several days later, on July 17, PCSO also responded to the house on an order of protection violation. Deputies located Gonzalez-Sandoval in his vehicle nearby and attempted to contact him but he fled. A pursuit followed, reaching speeds of over 100 miles per hour, but was terminated because of public safety, the sheriff’s office says.
Sheriff Paul Babeu says, “This foreign born criminal was in a gun fight with two of my Deputies and previously fled from us at speeds over 100mph. This dangerous criminal has an extensive rap sheet and should have been deported. Why are we allowing these violent non-citizen criminals sanctuary in America?”
NO – because no where in the article does it say “Illegal immigrant”.
What does this mean then Authorities say Gonzalez-Sandoval has 15 prior criminal cases, including two last month, under seven different aliases. He is not a U.S. citizen.Trying to make excuses for this guy and saying the Sheriff is lying and there is no little girl or there never was no 9-11 call. And The Arizona Department of Public Safety, U.S. Border Patrol and Pinal County Regional SWAT team are assisting in the search for Gonzalez-Sandoval is not really true according to you. I don’t get you people.You do not care what an illegal does the fact is he is illegal and this is suppose to make him off limits to the law.This is a typical Mexicans reply. If it did not bother you, mind your own business is the attitude of illegal Mexicans and their supporters.How soon before La Raza comes out and demands answers ? How soon before Holder has the family arrested for filing according to you a false police report ?Activists are very willing to allow criminal illegals to walk the streets of America. Activists only care about their illegals and Mexico nothing else matters.For the race everything rings so true here.Those outside the race nothing
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
Telemachus Bottom
July 15, 2011 8:58 pm
The judge has set a scheduling conference.
EDIT: They are probably trying to sweat the defendant a little so he will rat out his co-conspirators. I doubt he would get offered a plea bargain unless he gave them someone. You, maybe?
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
I am that I am
July 21, 2011 8:53 pm
what does “criminal case management’ (florida) mean?
my friend was caught selling rx drugs to an undercover cop, and im trying to follow the events via the internet (this happened in florida) and today was the arraignment. it says:
‘appearance record continuance’
‘Court Event Set Event: CRIMINAL – CASE MANAGEMENT Date: 11/04/2010 Time: 9:00 am Judge: ****** ********** *** Location: Courtroom *****’
‘ORDER FOR CASE MANAGEMENT’
can anyone tell me WTF is going on?
so its going to trial? no plea bargain?
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Aja Zobber
July 24, 2011 8:10 pm
I got this email today from what it appears to be “legal-support” of Google.com. Any idea what does that mean?
“Hello,
Google has received a subpoena for information related to your Google
account in a case entitled United States v. Glynn Neal, Superior Court of
********, Criminal Division, Case Number 2010 CF1 *****
(Internal Ref. No. ******”
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
justgetitright
July 27, 2011 3:25 am
Actually when dismissed with prejudice it means that they can not re-open the case.
Prejudice is about the same as saying that you have already had a court hearing thus if the case was re-opened it would be a violation of the 5th amendment (double jeopardy)
Breathe easy, you have nothing to fear unless you do it again.
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
please wait...
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.15_1155]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
LL
July 29, 2011 8:09 pm
Criminal case dismissed with prejudice?
Hello everyone:
I was charged with Larceny over $250 in Massachusetts in 2006. The case was dismissed with prejudice at the pre-trial.
Of course, this means that the case could be re-opened.
It is almost 2010. Can anyone tell me what are the chances of this case being re-opened?
I’m sorry. I meant to say that the case was dismissed WITH prejudice.
The charges were filed in 2006 for an alleged theft that occured in 2005. *The plaintiff/complainant is now out of the country.
June 3, 2011
7:34 pm
Can you name a case marking some development in state or federal constitutional law that was decided in 2010?
I’d prefer a case that has little to nothing to do with criminal law OR the recent Citizens United opinion. For example, a case involving the commerce clause (Article I, sec. 8), or the Second, Ninth, Tenth, or Fourteenth Amendments in the U.S. Constitution, or a “landmark” case involving a state constitution. Case must have been decided/filed in 2010. Case must mark some important development in state or federal constitutional law. GO!!!
June 28, 2011
5:31 am
how about this one: On January 5, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rendered a decision in a voting disenfranchisement case that found against Washington State’s voting law that disenfranchised thousands of individuals with past felony convictions. It was an important case because a disproportionate number of these individuals were Blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans. The decision highlighted the fact that people of color are disproportionately convicted, and thus disproportionately impacted by barriers that prohibit them from being fully privileged citizens after paying their debt to society.
NO. 06-35669
D.C. NO. CV-96-0076-RHW EASTERN WASHINGTON (TACOMA)
July 12, 2011
8:10 pm
Is this why SB 1070 is needed Search for Illegal Involved in Shootout Continues 15 prior criminal cases?
ARIZONA CITY, Ariz. – Pinal County authorities are continuing their search for an Arizona City man with an extensive criminal history who was involved in a gunfight with sheriff’s deputies.
The sheriff’s office says it received a 911 call Monday night from a child who claimed her father was trying to get inside her home south of Casa Grande. The man no longer lives there, and the girl’s mother apparently has an order of protection against him.
When deputies arrived, they say 38-year-old Jose Manuel Gonzalez-Sandoval began shooting at them and they returned fire. There were no reported injuries and deputies say Gonzalez-Sandoval was last seen running from the scene.
The Arizona Department of Public Safety, U.S. Border Patrol and Pinal County Regional SWAT team are assisting in the search for Gonzalez-Sandoval.
Authorities say Gonzalez-Sandoval has 15 prior criminal cases, including two last month, under seven different aliases. He is not a U.S. citizen.
Back on July 14, DPS booked Gonzalez-Sandoval into the Pinal County Adult Detention Facility on an outstanding warrant. He was turned over to ICE for deportation — but they released him as a Legal Permanent Resident Alien, according to the Pinal County Sheriff’s Office.
Then several days later, on July 17, PCSO also responded to the house on an order of protection violation. Deputies located Gonzalez-Sandoval in his vehicle nearby and attempted to contact him but he fled. A pursuit followed, reaching speeds of over 100 miles per hour, but was terminated because of public safety, the sheriff’s office says.
Sheriff Paul Babeu says, “This foreign born criminal was in a gun fight with two of my Deputies and previously fled from us at speeds over 100mph. This dangerous criminal has an extensive rap sheet and should have been deported. Why are we allowing these violent non-citizen criminals sanctuary in America?”
He is considered armed and dangerous and anyone who sees him should call 911 immediately.
http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/news/immigration/pinal-county-shootout-8-17-2010
Where is Obama at ?
July 13, 2011
4:19 am
NO – because no where in the article does it say “Illegal immigrant”.
What does this mean then Authorities say Gonzalez-Sandoval has 15 prior criminal cases, including two last month, under seven different aliases. He is not a U.S. citizen.Trying to make excuses for this guy and saying the Sheriff is lying and there is no little girl or there never was no 9-11 call. And The Arizona Department of Public Safety, U.S. Border Patrol and Pinal County Regional SWAT team are assisting in the search for Gonzalez-Sandoval is not really true according to you. I don’t get you people.You do not care what an illegal does the fact is he is illegal and this is suppose to make him off limits to the law.This is a typical Mexicans reply. If it did not bother you, mind your own business is the attitude of illegal Mexicans and their supporters.How soon before La Raza comes out and demands answers ? How soon before Holder has the family arrested for filing according to you a false police report ?Activists are very willing to allow criminal illegals to walk the streets of America. Activists only care about their illegals and Mexico nothing else matters.For the race everything rings so true here.Those outside the race nothing
July 15, 2011
8:58 pm
The judge has set a scheduling conference.
EDIT: They are probably trying to sweat the defendant a little so he will rat out his co-conspirators. I doubt he would get offered a plea bargain unless he gave them someone. You, maybe?
July 21, 2011
8:53 pm
what does “criminal case management’ (florida) mean?
my friend was caught selling rx drugs to an undercover cop, and im trying to follow the events via the internet (this happened in florida) and today was the arraignment. it says:
‘appearance record continuance’
‘Court Event Set Event: CRIMINAL – CASE MANAGEMENT Date: 11/04/2010 Time: 9:00 am Judge: ****** ********** *** Location: Courtroom *****’
‘ORDER FOR CASE MANAGEMENT’
can anyone tell me WTF is going on?
so its going to trial? no plea bargain?
July 24, 2011
8:10 pm
I got this email today from what it appears to be “legal-support” of Google.com. Any idea what does that mean?
“Hello,
Google has received a subpoena for information related to your Google
account in a case entitled United States v. Glynn Neal, Superior Court of
********, Criminal Division, Case Number 2010 CF1 *****
(Internal Ref. No. ******”
July 27, 2011
3:25 am
Actually when dismissed with prejudice it means that they can not re-open the case.
Prejudice is about the same as saying that you have already had a court hearing thus if the case was re-opened it would be a violation of the 5th amendment (double jeopardy)
Breathe easy, you have nothing to fear unless you do it again.
July 29, 2011
8:09 pm
Criminal case dismissed with prejudice?
Hello everyone:
I was charged with Larceny over $250 in Massachusetts in 2006. The case was dismissed with prejudice at the pre-trial.
Of course, this means that the case could be re-opened.
It is almost 2010. Can anyone tell me what are the chances of this case being re-opened?
I’m sorry. I meant to say that the case was dismissed WITH prejudice.
The charges were filed in 2006 for an alleged theft that occured in 2005. *The plaintiff/complainant is now out of the country.