California Attorney General Results
[STARTIMAGE]
[ENDIMAGE]
Searching Records At California Police Reports
by Elaine Jeans
There are many grounds as to why the California Police Records have been prepared readily available to the public. Essentially, such accounts are open as required by the law. Searchers should appreciate the fact that they are given the right to view such records for whatever purposes they deem necessary. A particular law has been implemented which allows anyone full access to the details on any legal document. Any person who has the interest of gathering factual data has the right do so. It is also very important that a person must conduct a records search in order to safeguard the general public from any type of danger.
Integrated in the records are the criminal convictions in California, inmate records, criminal court reports, police files, sex offenders" files and the other related matters. With the development of modern database records through the World Wide Web, these vital documents are obtainable in just a few clicks. The internet is like a digital public library on a global scale. Any data can be acquired if you know what you are looking for.
Law enforcement Records are important in many areas of concern. Relevant data can be acquired online in exchange for a very reasonable fee. The sum of money that you are going to spend is definitely worth the quality of the generated search results. If time is of the essence and relevant data are needed, look no further, you are on the right track. Just select a trustworthy site which offers an updated data on various topics needed. Such trustworthy online data providers will be glad to assist you in any way they can.
The World Wide Web today is one of the most recognizable and respected sources of any important data on just about anything under the sun. Data of any type can easily be extracted with the help of online modern computerization. Anyone with an expertise on any subject can upload and share relevant data on the web. Any creative writer can purchase a website or write on free hosting blog sites and compose just about any type of article. Unforeseeably, even smart children can write anything on the internet. Anyone can upload data; download any files, share pictures, movies, music, digital games, private documents, video chat, and much more.
The great news about the internet is that such important reports can be acquired privately at your own home without any hassles. This is definitely the most effective method to obtain the any category of records nowadays. You can choose what to download or purchase online. You can also be safe from viruses or malware when you choose to acquire data from respectable online data providers.
Many public record searchers have experienced the slow retrieval method when it comes to obtaining some important government records at some chosen government record offices. The hindrances often times are due to imposed formalities or unforeseen technical issues by many of the unprepared data searchers. With the internet, you don"t have to go to the government offices to request for Public Police Reports, with unfortunate slow response rates. Get it online where it"s fast and hot.
December 7, 2010
3:59 am
The judge is correct.
Edit to get a life:
We have a death penalty not a “death by torture penalty.”
December 7, 2010
4:29 am
These people want a lawlessness America and want illegals to be above our laws.free to do whatever they want.maybe all criminals can say the police should not arrest anyone or else Americans report the crimes, “but now they can’t do that safely.”
December 7, 2010
2:14 pm
Every kidnapping can be blamed on the supporters an the illegals. They ae the ones who allow this to happen. this is why the laws are needed.
December 7, 2010
2:59 pm
Do You Believe This is Unconstitutional?
FACTS: Obama’s attorneys went to a California State Court along with California’s State Attorney General Jerry Brown and convinced the judge to rule that only Members of Congress can challenge the qualifications of serving as President. He further ruled that a challenge can only be made on the 6th day of January following the meeting of the Presidential electors, at the session of Congress where the vote of the Electoral College is counted and the results announced.
This question has nothing to do with the ongoing crap about Obama’s eligibility. My question is whether it is Constitututional. Why would we allow a President to implement laws such as this? Will he next go to a small rinky dink court in another liberal state and implement a law saying that his term will be for 8 years instead of four?
I will get you the link as soon as I can – the site is down right now. Sorry.
The hearing was on March 13th.
December 7, 2010
3:05 pm
The reason Obama is president (as opposed to being disqualified) is that there is NO CLEAR AUTHORITY who verifies if a candidate is properly qualified.
What is needed is a NATIONAL authority who is charged with making a CLEAR yes/no answer.
Through it all…. what does it tell you that Obama SEALED his records instead of just showing the REAL birth certificate and putting an end to the “nonsense”?
Basically put…. innocent people don’t run from the police, and people with “nothing to hide” don’t seal their records.
December 7, 2010
7:47 pm
If I told you that your vote really doesn’t count, what would you say? Read this little quote, then answer. Ok
In 1986, the California Attorney General’s office released a report criticizing computerized vote-counting systems for “lacking a reliable audit trail and having a program structure that is very difficult even for computer professionals to understand.” In 88, the National Bureau of Standards(now called the National Institute of Standards and Technology) released a study by computer scientist Roy G. Saltman that concluded, in the typically understated language of government documents,that “it has been clearly shown that audit trails that document election results, as well as general practices to assure accuracy, integrity, and security, can be significantly improved.”
There is alot more to type but…. go for it anyway.
Hey, I chose 1986 and 1988 studies to prove that the syatem has been unreliable for a long time. There are alot more studies since. Most notably is the NORC which conluded that we have major problems.
No, it isn’t straight from a law journal… buit thanks for playing. Yes, I understand what the ‘Electoral College’ is and I understand the safeguards, as well. But…. who are they protecting? Maybe that is the question I should have asked.
Okay… don’t answer this question to jack a couple of points… I would really prefer some legitimate answers or thoughts. The rest of you ‘partisan’ #@%@$^%$#@ go away. This is a non-partisan issue.
December 7, 2010
7:54 pm
Read VOTESCAM and learn just how deep vote manipulation has gone in our countries elections. Well researched book.
December 7, 2010
8:07 pm
why do you think this article on tennessee lethal injections is newsworthy?
NASHVILLE, Tenn. – A federal judge ruled Wednesday that Tennessee’s new lethal injection procedures are cruel and unusual punishment, interrupting plans to execute a killer next week.
ADVERTISEMENT
The protocol “presents a substantial risk of unnecessary pain” and violates death row inmate Edward Jerome Harbison’s constitutional protections under the Eighth Amendment, U.S. District Judge Aleta Trauger said.
The new protocol, released in April, does not ensure that inmates are properly anesthetized before the lethal injection is administered, Trauger said, which could “result in a terrifying, excruciating death.”
A spokeswoman for the state attorney general’s office said officials are reviewing the ruling and haven’t decided whether to appeal. Gov. Phil Bredesen’s office had no immediate comment.
Harbison was scheduled to be executed Sept. 26 for beating an elderly woman to death during a burglary in 1983.
Trauger did not issue a stay or throw out the death sentence for Harbison, who has lost all his appeals. He can be legally executed once the state adopts a valid method of execution, she said.
Another federal judge in Nashville this year ordered a delay in the execution of convicted killer Philip Workman, citing the likelihood that the state’s new guidelines could still cause unconstitutional pain and suffering. But a three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals lifted that temporary restraining order, and Workman was executed by lethal injection May 9.
Bredesen, a Democrat, in February placed a 90-day moratorium on executions because of several glaring problems with the state’s execution guidelines, including conflicting instructions that mixed lethal injection instructions with those for the electric chair.
George Little, State Department of Correction commissioner, adopted the new protocol despite having knowledge about the remaining risks of excessive pain for inmates, Trauger said. A spokeswoman for Little did not immediately return a message seeking comment.
Little did not give enough consideration to a recommendation to discard the standard three-drug lethal injection cocktail in favor of a single drug method, Trauger said. Current training and medical expertise are not sufficient to ensure a painless execution, she said.
Most states use three drugs — thiopental, an anesthetic; pancuronium bromide, a nerve blocker and muscle paralyzer; and potassium chloride, a drug to stop the heart. Each is supposed to be capable of killing by itself, but if not, the anesthetic is supposed to render the inmate unconscious while the other drugs do the job.
Lethal injection has been adopted by 37 states as a cheaper and more humane alternative to electrocution, gas chambers and other execution methods. But at least 11 states suspended its use after opponents alleged it was ineffective and cruel.
The issue came to a head last year in California when a federal judge ordered that doctors assist in killing Michael Morales, who was convicted of raping and murdering a teenage girl. Doctors refused, and legal arguments continue.
The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last month lifted a more than year-old stay on executions in Missouri, refusing to block capital punishment while a death-row inmate asked the U.S. Supreme Court to declare the state’s form of lethal injection to be an unconstitutionally cruel punishment.
Tennessee executed convicted child killer Daryl Holton last week in its first electrocution since 1960.
Bredesen on Friday commuted a death sentence for Michael Joe Boyd because of “grossly inadequate” legal representation during post-conviction hearings. Boyd, who now goes by Mika’eel Abdullah Abdus-Samad, was convicted of murdering a man during an armed robbery in 1986. The death sentence was commuted to life without possibility of parole
December 7, 2010
8:10 pm
Why would activists say , an illegal committed a volient crime they do NOT want ice to have their prints?
On the same day San Mateo County Sheriff Greg Munks began sending the fingerprints of everyone arrested to federal immigration authorities, immigrant rights activists Tuesday called on county supervisors to halt the practice.
But the supervisors may not have much of a choice in the matter because California Attorney General Jerry Brown later in the day denied a request by San Francisco’s sheriff to opt out of similarly sending arrestees’ fingerprints to the feds.
The so-called Secure Communities program is being rolled out nationwide by U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in an effort to identify illegal immigrants.
Virginia Kice, an ICE spokeswoman, said counties already send fingerprints captured during jail bookings to law enforcement databases maintained by the state Department of Justice and the FBI to check for other warrants and past criminal history.
Under Secure Communities, the fingerprints are automatically compared with those in the Department of Homeland Security’s immigration database. The results are then reported back to local jurisdictions.
Critics say the policy means illegal immigrants arrested for minor crimes could be deported, even if criminal charges are never filed, making them reluctant to report crimes. In addition, the program could affect the small percentage of legal citizens whose fingerprints were mistakenly entered into the federal immigration database, activists said at Tuesday’s
rally in Redwood City.
“This makes people more vulnerable. I think they won’t trust the sheriff,” said Reena Johan, a member of the board for the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California.
Kice said authorities just want to identify illegal immigrants with lengthy criminal histories or deportation records. She said Secure Communities is “nothing more than an information sharing system” that will allow authorities to make “prudent decisions about follow-up actions.
“One of the challenges we face is because of the volume of people encountered by local law enforcement, we believe, in some cases, criminally convicted aliens that may pose a threat to public safety are being released back onto the streets,” Kice said.
While counties already check the names of some arrestees with federal immigration officials, Kice said the accused sometimes give false information. “Fingerprints don’t lie,” she said.
Board of Supervisors President Rich Gordon said the county counsel will prepare a report to determine whether San Mateo County can consider not participating, but added it “doesn’t sound that way under what Jerry Brown said today.”
Brown sent a letter Tuesday denying the San Francisco sheriff’s request to opt out, saying the program “serves both public safety and the interests of justice.”
“If the attorney general’s ruling is applicable to all counties and is a ruling that would stand, then we follow the law until such time the law is changed,” Gordon said.
Secure Communities has already been implemented in 169 counties in 20 states, including 17 in California, according to the attorney general.
Gordon said he has not yet formed an opinion about whether the county should opt out if it can, but noted he wants to “make sure this is not something that makes it more difficult for legal immigrants in our country (and) not something that ends up providing a profiling opportunity.”
He also noted that while supervisors could voice their opinion, the program is implemented by the sheriff, and “at the end of the day it would end up being his decision.” Munks could not be reached for comment.
Before news of Brown’s ruling, activist groups — including the International Institute of the Bay Area and the Immigrant Legal Resource Center — delivered a letter to the board saying they have serious concerns about the program and believe it is optional for counties.
Sara Matlin, an attorney who represents domestic violence victims, said the abused are sometimes arrested if abusers accuse them of violence. Matlin, who also serves on the ACLU’s board, said she usually encourages illegal immigrant victims to report the crimes, “but now I can’t do that safely.”
So if an illegal committed a volient crime they do NOT want ice to have their prints such if an illegal killed somebody they are saying by giving his prints to ICE it would cause distrust in the illegal community and activits are now saying illegals should be allowed to kill, rob banks, steal cars without the police doing anything due to distrust ?http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_15161293?nclick_check=1
December 7, 2010
8:10 pm
What do you think Mexican gangs kidnap,hold for ransom illegals sneaking into US what worse this or SB 1070?
TECATE, Mexico — The bedraggled immigrants were picking their way through the boulders and scrub when a group of heavily armed men descended on them short of the California-Mexico border. They corralled them in a cave and pointed their guns at the 10 men and one woman.
These lawless badlands in the hills east of Tijuana long have teemed with bandits and rapists, but these criminals demanded only phone numbers. They started calling the immigrants’ loved ones in Pomona, San Diego and Bakersfield: Send money or we’ll shoot, they said.
The days-long kidnapping ordeal in May illustrates what authorities say is a growing trend as roaming gangs of well-organized, heavily armed gunmen turn their sights on illegal immigrants, making a treacherous journey more dangerous for people trekking north.
In the rash of kidnappings, which began about two years ago, gunmen hold people captive until relatives in the United States send wire transfers of up to $5,000 to accounts in Mexico. Some immigrants are beaten; several have been killed, including two brothers from Mexico City. Many straggle across the border and turn themselves in to Border Patrol agents. Others end up in migrant shelters in Tijuana, too frightened to report the cases to Mexican police.
Little was known about how the criminals operated until Mexican authorities dismantled two gangs in recent months, including the one involved in the May case, in which 11 suspects were arrested after a shootout and a foot chase through the hills.
The arrests provided authorities with a rare glimpse into criminal networks whose reach stretches from the border to cities across the United States and Mexico. The gang allegedly was run by a career criminal from Nayarit state and included a former Mexican army soldier. They admitted kidnapping more than 100 immigrants over 18 months, holding them in remote caves, makeshift camps and ranches.
“We threatened the families that if they didn’t pay, we would kill the immigrants,” Jose Flores Romero, the suspected ringleader, said in his statement to detectives, referring to the abductions in May.
Authorities believe several gangs continue to operate. With a network of lookouts scattered at key points across 60 miles of rugged, isolated terrain, few immigrants slip by them without the gangs’ knowledge.
“They know all the trails leading to the border, from Tijuana to Tecate and the La Rumorosa” mountain range, said Fermin Gomez, a Baja California assistant attorney general. “They know exactly where they’re going, how many are walking, and they’re all intercepted.”
The current situation resulted from a convergence of factors in the United States and Mexico that put increasing pressure on the traditional human-smuggling groups in the area, according to authorities in both countries.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2012415834_immig22.html
I do not see any supporters or latino’s out and about protesting this ?